![]() |
|
|
|
Q&A with Ian ArchibaldSince announcing to the media that a locally formed team had located
a wooden shipwreck off Burntisland, the Project Manager Ian Archibald
has been asked many questions about the background and progress of this
high profile project. Here he answers some of these, which are complemented
with images where possible |
||
| 1. Why don't you just go and dig it up? | 2. How did you get involved? | 3. When did you first locate the site? | |
| 4. The papers mentioned you using a map dowser from Lancashire? | 5. Why was the site not reported then? | 6. What happened then? | |
| 7. There was a report about divers touching timbers. Is this true? | 8. How was the site designated? | 9. When will you know what it is you have found? | |
| 10. How is the site protected? | 11. What will the survey involve? | 12. What happens after the survey? | |
| 13. As well as the survey what else is happening? | 14. Given the huge publicity the project was given have you been able to attract any support from major sponsors? | ||
1. Why don't you just go and dig it up?
Any shipwreck found buried in the seabed is a unique, valuable, historical and archaeological resource. Anything we inherit from the past should be responsibly passed on to those that come after us. Evidence of our common heritage is finite and you only get one opportunity to recover the itemyou investigate. Even the most painstaking archaeological excavation dismantles the site forever and needs to be properly planned and resourced so that the maximun amount of evidence, in the form of finds, and information can be saved and recorded for future use. Any disturbance and exposure immediately starts the process of deterioration. That is why it is important to carry out the work in a staged process worked through carefully to the highest standard we can achieve. Part of that information gathering process is the pre-disturbance survey which the Trust has just successfully completed.
2. How did you get involved?
I live in Burntisland and work as a Cartographic Manager in Edinburgh. When
I first heard the story from Alex Kilgour, a Kirkcaldy businessman, I was fascinated
and it really captured my imagination. After all it isn't everyday you hear
of a baggage ferry laden with a King's precious household items sinking offshore
and close to where you live. This was in 1992. I instigated a local support
group, which later became Burntisland Heritage. In 1997 following two years
of inactivity I realised that our future depended on what happened out on the
water, so I formed a small team and resurrected the search.
![]() |
3. When did you first locate the site?
It's a long story, much of which has already been reported. We first identified
an interesting target using side scan in November 1997. It was very small but
worthy of further investigation.
![]() |
On board Royal Navy survey vessel HMS Roebuck, November 1997 |
4.
The papers mentioned you using a map dowser from Lancashire?
Yes this is Jim Longton. Our target was precisely the position he had marked
on an Admiralty Chart and had navigated to months earlier and previous to our
survey. Jim remains adamant that we have found the site of the missing ferry.

![]()
5. Why was the site not reported then?
We needed more evidence. We spent the next twelve months slowly gathering it
together. We had no money but fortunately there were some companies who lent
a hand. Matt Blair from Tritech International Ltd., a company specialising in
sonar equipment, gave up a few weekends to assist us with more sonar surveys.
Another company Effective Solutions Ltd. based in Hampshire helped us with better
positioning equipment It all started coming together in late Autumn 1998.

6.
What happened then?
An Edinburgh scientist, Dr Colin Stove helped us with image enhancement of the
side scan data. He was also keen to test some equipment he had been developing
which would penetrate the seabed and give us the sub bottom survey we had been
so desperate to resource. This was carried out on 'The Maid of the Forth'. The
survey was an experiment using state of the art technology, which confirmed
an intact wooden shipwreck lying, completed buried in the mud.

7. There
was a report about divers touching timbers. Is this true?
Yes it is and it was the final piece of evidence we needed. On the 1st December
1998, team divers Mark Blyth from Burntisland Watersports and our Technical
Support Leader Carl Galfskiy dived the site and on a circular search located
timber protruding slightly above the mud. Examination confirmed that it formed
part of a much larger bulk. Some reports had it that they touched a mast but
this is incorrect.
| Divers Mark Blyth, Carl Galfiskiy and George Penn | ![]() |
8. How was the site designated?
I presented a portfolio of evidence to Dr Noel Fojut at Historic Scotland. This
went out to various bodies for consultation in confidence. The Order was laid
before Parliament in January. After the news conference held at the Pettycur
Bay Holiday Park Centre on the 29th January the site was immediately designated
by the Secretary of State. It is important to note and worth mentioning that
there are very few Historic Wreck sites in Scotland and this is the very first
in the Firth of Forth. Even if it is not the King Charles baggage ferry it is
still a major find.
9. When will you know what it is you have found?
Part of our remit in carrying out the pre-disturbance survey is to try and obtain
dating evidence from the ship's timbers. This is not as easy as it may sound.
We have to obtain the right sample first and that is assuming that the timbers
are still visible. I suspect that the seabed is constantly changing in this
vicinity.
10. How is the site protected?
The order means that anyone diving on or near the wreck site without a licence
is a criminal offence, which could carry an unlimited fine.
11. What will the survey involve?
The site needs to be surveyed, prior to any significant seabed disturbance
by the best available physical and geophysical techniques to establish a clear
picture of its nature, state of preservation and disposition. Precision mapping
of the seabed will involve a combination of remote sensing and ongoing diving
activities. All of the data we collect will be recorded and utilised in a Geographical
Information System. The Archaeology Diving Unit from St Andrews University will
be assisting me with this from May. The Royal Navy has pledged support at the
beginning of July and I hope to be a position to submit a preliminary report
to Historic Scotland by the end of that month. The Trust has a core of named
divers who will continue with ongoing monitoring of the site. The first nautical
archaeology diving course has just been completed. The Trust hosted the course,
which was run by Phil Robertson from the Loch Aline Dive Centre. Divers from
Kirkcaldy and Edinburgh British Sub Aqua Clubs took part.
|
|
|
12. What happens after the survey?
Examination of the wreck will be carried out in accordance with strict archaeological
guidelines and Historic Scotland will be responsible for assuring that these
standards are met and maintained. This will be a scientific attempt to recover
the true nature of the past. We want to do this responsibly and we want to do
this well. We want to conduct the project on a local basis but to national standards
and with national support. The success of this project to date has come about
by teamwork and we can build on this by developing partnerships with those who
share our objectives and goals.
13. As well as the survey what else is happening?
The project is now working under the auspices of the Trust whose Trustees has
been exceptionally busy. We have recently set up an office at 4 Kirkgate, Burntisland
Fife KY3 9DB and this will be opening shortly and will act as a focal point
for our activities. A small exhibition will be housed in this accommodation
by the summer. The need for sponsors and funding is a major objective. We are
also looking for voluntary people support. If anyone feels they have a skill
to offer then they should drop us a note to the office or contact
us via email.
14. Given the huge publicity the project was given
have you been able to attract any support from major sponsors?
Not as yet and this is disappointing given our present financial requirements
to do the job properly. There are probably a number of reasons for this, one
of them being that we are still unable to confirm the identity of the shipwreck.
We are however in the process of negotiating with TV companies and when this
is concluded it will alter the perspective. Our resources to seek major funding
are limited given that we are only just established and are still very much
a voluntary group. If you know of any organisation that may be interested in
providing sponsorship or assistance then please contact
us.