CoverOB.jpg (135479 bytes)

 






















Q&A with Ian Archibald

Since announcing to the media that a locally formed team had located a wooden shipwreck off Burntisland, the Project Manager Ian Archibald has been asked many questions about the background and progress of this high profile project. Here he answers some of these, which are complemented with images where possible

1. Why don't you just go and dig it up? 2. How did you get involved? 3. When did you first locate the site?
4. The papers mentioned you using a map dowser from Lancashire? 5. Why was the site not reported then? 6. What happened then?
7. There was a report about divers touching timbers. Is this true? 8. How was the site designated? 9. When will you know what it is you have found?
10. How is the site protected? 11. What will the survey involve? 12. What happens after the survey?
13. As well as the survey what else is happening? 14. Given the huge publicity the project was given have you been able to attract any support from major sponsors?  


1. Why don't you just go and dig it up?

Any shipwreck found buried in the seabed is a unique, valuable, historical and archaeological resource. Anything we inherit from the past should be responsibly passed on to those that come after us. Evidence of our common heritage is finite and you only get one opportunity to recover the itemyou investigate. Even the most painstaking archaeological excavation dismantles the site forever and needs to be properly planned and resourced so that the maximun amount of evidence, in the form of finds, and information can be saved and recorded for future use. Any disturbance and exposure immediately starts the process of deterioration. That is why it is important to carry out the work in a staged process worked through carefully to the highest standard we can achieve. Part of that information gathering process is the pre-disturbance survey which the Trust has just successfully completed.

2. How did you get involved?
I live in Burntisland and work as a Cartographic Manager in Edinburgh. When I first heard the story from Alex Kilgour, a Kirkcaldy businessman, I was fascinated and it really captured my imagination. After all it isn't everyday you hear of a baggage ferry laden with a King's precious household items sinking offshore and close to where you live. This was in 1992. I instigated a local support group, which later became Burntisland Heritage. In 1997 following two years of inactivity I realised that our future depended on what happened out on the water, so I formed a small team and resurrected the search.

3. When did you first locate the site?
It's a long story, much of which has already been reported. We first identified an interesting target using side scan in November 1997. It was very small but worthy of further investigation.

On board Royal Navy survey vessel HMS Roebuck, November 1997

4. The papers mentioned you using a map dowser from Lancashire?
Yes this is Jim Longton. Our target was precisely the position he had marked on an Admiralty Chart and had navigated to months earlier and previous to our survey. Jim remains adamant that we have found the site of the missing ferry.




5. Why was the site not reported then?
We needed more evidence. We spent the next twelve months slowly gathering it together. We had no money but fortunately there were some companies who lent a hand. Matt Blair from Tritech International Ltd., a company specialising in sonar equipment, gave up a few weekends to assist us with more sonar surveys. Another company Effective Solutions Ltd. based in Hampshire helped us with better positioning equipment It all started coming together in late Autumn 1998.

 

6. What happened then?
An Edinburgh scientist, Dr Colin Stove helped us with image enhancement of the side scan data. He was also keen to test some equipment he had been developing which would penetrate the seabed and give us the sub bottom survey we had been so desperate to resource. This was carried out on 'The Maid of the Forth'. The survey was an experiment using state of the art technology, which confirmed an intact wooden shipwreck lying, completed buried in the mud.


7. There was a report about divers touching timbers. Is this true?
Yes it is and it was the final piece of evidence we needed. On the 1st December 1998, team divers Mark Blyth from Burntisland Watersports and our Technical Support Leader Carl Galfskiy dived the site and on a circular search located timber protruding slightly above the mud. Examination confirmed that it formed part of a much larger bulk. Some reports had it that they touched a mast but this is incorrect.

Divers Mark Blyth, Carl Galfiskiy and George Penn

 

8. How was the site designated?
I presented a portfolio of evidence to Dr Noel Fojut at Historic Scotland. This went out to various bodies for consultation in confidence. The Order was laid before Parliament in January. After the news conference held at the Pettycur Bay Holiday Park Centre on the 29th January the site was immediately designated by the Secretary of State. It is important to note and worth mentioning that there are very few Historic Wreck sites in Scotland and this is the very first in the Firth of Forth. Even if it is not the King Charles baggage ferry it is still a major find.

9. When will you know what it is you have found?
Part of our remit in carrying out the pre-disturbance survey is to try and obtain dating evidence from the ship's timbers. This is not as easy as it may sound. We have to obtain the right sample first and that is assuming that the timbers are still visible. I suspect that the seabed is constantly changing in this vicinity.

10. How is the site protected?
The order means that anyone diving on or near the wreck site without a licence is a criminal offence, which could carry an unlimited fine.

11. What will the survey involve?
The site needs to be surveyed, prior to any significant seabed disturbance by the best available physical and geophysical techniques to establish a clear picture of its nature, state of preservation and disposition. Precision mapping of the seabed will involve a combination of remote sensing and ongoing diving activities. All of the data we collect will be recorded and utilised in a Geographical Information System. The Archaeology Diving Unit from St Andrews University will be assisting me with this from May. The Royal Navy has pledged support at the beginning of July and I hope to be a position to submit a preliminary report to Historic Scotland by the end of that month. The Trust has a core of named divers who will continue with ongoing monitoring of the site. The first nautical archaeology diving course has just been completed. The Trust hosted the course, which was run by Phil Robertson from the Loch Aline Dive Centre. Divers from Kirkcaldy and Edinburgh British Sub Aqua Clubs took part.


Phil Robertson lectures on
nautical archaeology


Pool Training -
underwater survey techniques


12. What happens after the survey?
Examination of the wreck will be carried out in accordance with strict archaeological guidelines and Historic Scotland will be responsible for assuring that these standards are met and maintained. This will be a scientific attempt to recover the true nature of the past. We want to do this responsibly and we want to do this well. We want to conduct the project on a local basis but to national standards and with national support. The success of this project to date has come about by teamwork and we can build on this by developing partnerships with those who share our objectives and goals.

13. As well as the survey what else is happening?
The project is now working under the auspices of the Trust whose Trustees has been exceptionally busy. We have recently set up an office at 4 Kirkgate, Burntisland Fife KY3 9DB and this will be opening shortly and will act as a focal point for our activities. A small exhibition will be housed in this accommodation by the summer. The need for sponsors and funding is a major objective. We are also looking for voluntary people support. If anyone feels they have a skill to offer then they should drop us a note to the office or contact us via email.

14. Given the huge publicity the project was given have you been able to attract any support from major sponsors?
Not as yet and this is disappointing given our present financial requirements to do the job properly. There are probably a number of reasons for this, one of them being that we are still unable to confirm the identity of the shipwreck. We are however in the process of negotiating with TV companies and when this is concluded it will alter the perspective. Our resources to seek major funding are limited given that we are only just established and are still very much a voluntary group. If you know of any organisation that may be interested in providing sponsorship or assistance then please contact us.